Connect with us

BIAFRA & IPOB

Nnamdi Kanu’s Lawyer Objects Extension of Time by Abubakar Malami in A N5billion lawsuit filed Against Nigerian government

Published

on

Nnamdi Kanu’s Lawyer Objects Extension of Time by Abubakar Malami in A N5billion lawsuit filed In opposition to Nigerian authorities   The Nig…

Nnamdi Kanu’s Lawyer Objects Extension of Time by Abubakar Malami in A
N5billion lawsuit filed In opposition to Nigerian authorities

 

The Nigerian authorities by way of the Lawyer-Common of the Federation, Abubakar Malami (SAN) has pleaded with the Abia State Excessive Courtroom to provide it and different six respondents an extension of time to defend the lawsuit filed by Aloy Ejimakor on behalf of the chief of the Indigenous Folks of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, SaharaReporters has gathered.

Recall that the IPOB chief by way of his lawyer had in August 2021 approached the Abia Excessive Courtroom to implement his elementary rights, stemming from the army invasion of his Umuahia residence in September 2017 and his subsequent “extraordinary rendition” from Kenya in late June 2021.

SaharaReporters had reported that Ejimakor lamented on October 7 when the case got here up for listening to, that the case file had not be assigned from the holiday court docket the place it was final heard on twenty first September.

In a court docket doc obtained by SaharaReporters on Wednesday, the Respondents which included the President Muhammadu Buhari’s authorities and the Lawyer have been served on tenth September, 2021.

This indicated that that they had 5 days from the date of service to answer to the go well with in accordance with the Elementary Rights Enforcements Process Guidelines. These 5 days expired on fifteenth September, 2021.

Loading...

Nevertheless, the appliance for extension of time which was filed on sixth October is being opposed by Ejimakor.

A perusal of the Software by the Nigerian authorities and the AGF revealed that they pleaded for the discretion of the court docket to just accept their defence regardless of their lateness.

The Courtroom doc partly learn, “The Respondents shall be heard praying this Honourable Courtroom for the next orders.

“An order for an extension of time throughout the 1st and 2nd Respondents can file and serve his Counter-Affidavit and different processes on this go well with out of time.

“An order deeming the mentioned filed processes as having been duly filed and served.”

In his reply, Barrister Ejimakor opposed the appliance, citing statutory and judicial authorities that disallowed inordinate delays in listening to circumstances of this nature, particularly as he mentioned that his Consumer, Kanu is in detention.

It additionally emerged that the case had been assigned for listening to to Abia Excessive Courtroom 1, which is claimed to be presided over by the Chief Decide of the State.

Our checks revealed that the subsequent listening to date has not been set.

Supply

Advertisements
Loading...
Share this Story
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Advertisement

TRENDING