Connect with us

NEWS

HEDA Threatens Lawsuit Against Ex-AGF, Adoke, Demands Retraction Of “Defamatory Statement”

Published

on

Loading...

Anti-corruption group, the Human and Environmental Growth Agenda, (HEDA Useful resource Centre), has given a former Minister of Justice and Legal professional Basic of the Federation, Mohammed Adoke, 14 days to retract his “defamatory assertion” towards the group or face courtroom motion.

Advertisements
Loading...

In a petition by its Chairman, Olanrewaju Suraj, the group acknowledged that Adoke tried to destroy the popularity of the anti-graft group by means of a string of lies geared toward diverting public consideration from gross allegations of corruption that surrounded the OPL 245 oil offers.





“Defamation is being employed as a software to shift the general public debate from a transparent case of corruption involving Nigerian politicians and their collaborators. The case of forgery of emails made by Adoke and his group is an affordable act of defamation that HEDA will vigorously problem,” Suraju wrote within the petition addressed to Adoke’s lawyer, Kanu Agabi.
 
A whole bunch of teams and people have risen in defence of HEDA at residence and overseas for the group’s constant outcry towards corruption.
 












The letter to Agabi titled ‘Defamation of Human and Environmental Growth Agenda (HEDA Useful resource Centre) and Suraju,’ mentioned Adoke’s petition titled “Forgery of Paperwork for Functions of Illegal Interference with the Course of Justice” extensively reported by media homes was fully unfaithful, extremely defamatory and deceptive to the regulation enforcement company.
 
HEDA mentioned it was wrongly accused by Adoke of felony acts resembling forgery and falsification of proof, “accusations which can be extremely damaging to the popularity of HEDA as a revered anti-corruption group in Nigeria and overseas”.
 
HEDA requested Adoke to subject a full retraction of the defamatory statements made towards the group and its chairman on the earliest attainable date.

“If inside 14 days of the receipt of the letter, no retraction has been made, we are going to provoke authorized motion towards Mr Adoke SAN and his brokers,” Suraju mentioned.
 
He mentioned the group reserves the best to carry proceedings in Nigeria or every other jurisdiction the place harm has been triggered.
 
“We’re at the moment assessing the extent of the harm to our popularity brought on by web publication of the petition in Nigeria. Given the broad readership of Nigerian newspapers which reported the petition on-line the world over, we imagine that many readers may have learn the defamations. Our actions in direction of the treatment of the damages will rely upon the velocity and nature of your response,” the anti-corruption group mentioned.
 
Adoke’s petition had demanded an investigation into what was alleged to be numerous acts of forgery by “the events liable for the petition, investigations and graduation of the felony trial on the courtroom of Milan towards the people/entities linked with the OPL 245 settlement settlement”.

The petition additionally states that “the individuals or organisations behind these forgeries are those that authored the petition to the Financial and Monetary Crimes Fee (EFCC), demanding the investigation of the OPL 245 Decision Settlement”.
 












However reacting, HEDA acknowledged: “Your shopper, Bello Adoke additional appeared earlier than the Inspector Basic of Police’s Monitoring Unit to undertake this petition and particularly talked about the names of Human and Environmental Growth Agenda (HEDA) and its Chairman, Olanrewaju Suraju as a suspect referenced in your letter.

“HEDA has authored over 500 complaints to Financial and Monetary Crimes Fee, Unbiased Corrupt Practices and different Associated Offences Fee, Code of Conduct Bureau and different worldwide regulation enforcement businesses on instances just like that involving your purchasers, leading to investigations, prosecution and convictions of these affected. The OPL245 is one in every of these a number of complaints and by no means was the group accused of bias or deceptive the regulation enforcement businesses in any of those complaints.”

Share this Story
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Advertisement

TRENDING